A Look at Rodgers’ Rank Among NFL’s QBs (Pt. 2) | BrentFavre.com – The Packers Blog Born From Treachery
Twitter Facebook Flickr Youtube Myspace Feed

Friday, May 18, 2012

A Look at Rodgers’ Rank Among NFL’s QBs (Pt. 2)

Posted by Danny Goldin on April 30, 2010   Jump To Comments

If you missed Part 1 of this column, check it out right here.

I already concluded that Peyton Manning, Drew Brees and Tom Brady are the consensus top-3 quarterbacks in the league, but who is No. 4? Again, I’ll be basing my decision on who I’d like under center for my team in 2010.

Cutler does have one thing over Rodgers; he's really good at throwing interceptions and then either sulking or blaming his teammates afterward.

I’ll throw a few names out of contention right off the bat. Jay Cutler might have the necessary skill set but is just too inconsistent, sorry Bears fans. Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco both have bright futures, but simply aren’t there yet. Carson Palmer was excellent in 2005 and 2006 but hasn’t been nearly the same quarterback since. While all of those guys have fine potential, you’re honestly taking crazy pills if you think that any of them are No. 4.

Matt Schaub was excellent last year, but he did have more than twice as many interceptions as Rodgers. It also took him until 28 years of age to get through his first season at full health, needless to say that durability remains a concern.

Donovan McNabb has had a fine career but is undeniably past his prime. He’s never once passed for 4,000 yards and isn’t very mobile anymore (Rodgers is certainly a better runner at this point). If you look at the numbers, he’s actually only had one season (2004) that was better than either of Rodgers’ past two seasons, and you could even argue that 09 Rodgers was better than 04 McNabb, or at least just as good.

Not only is Brenda Warner really frickin' annoying, but her hair is also very short and gray.

Kurt Warner would be in the argument if he was back, but alas, he’ll be spending all his time at Home Depot with his annoying wife Brenda.

I’m going to bunch Eli Manning and Ben Roethlisberger together. Yes, I’m aware they’ve each won a Super Bowl (and in Big Ben’s case, two of them) but the fact of the matter is that they just aren’t that good. They’re good, just not that good. Manning really never had an above average statistical season until this past year, and even then, he wasn’t anything special after the first five weeks of the season. His team went 3-8, largely because he threw over one interception per game.

Onto Ben. First off, I’d like to kill the notion that he should be considered better than every other quarterback outside the top-3 due to the fact that he’s won multiple Super Bowls. Why am I going to kill that notion? Ben went 9-of-21 for 123 yards, zero touchdowns and two interceptions in his first Super Bowl win. Needless to say, they didn’t win that game because of him. If they didn’t win because of him, I’m not going to increase his rank because of it. Other than that, everything about his numbers shows a good, but simply not great, quarterback. Oh yeah, and I also hear that he’s kind of shady.

Rodgers has been pulling in the honeys lately. There's no denying that he's a very sexy man.

With all those names out the door, there are really just four candidates in my mind: Tony Romo, Philip Rivers, our boy Aaron Rodgers, and — funny how his name always finds a way to come up — Brent Favre. First, let’s look Romo. Sure, the man always tends to put up gaudy regular season stats, but would you trust him to hold your kick — let alone quarterback your team — in the playoffs? I know he won his first playoff game this past season, but I still think he’s pretty darn soft. There’s that, and then there’s the fact that he’s not even with Jessica Simpson anymore. Based on TMZ’s latest findings, Rodgers probably has Romo beat in the lady department, as well as the playing field. Rivers is legit, but his playoff resume has also seen mixed results. He’s now had four full seasons as a starter, most of them surrounded by excellent talent, and you kind of get the feeling that he’s topped out. Don’t get me wrong, most teams would happily take the level of play he’s displayed the last few years, but I just don’t see reason to believe he’ll ever be any better. Also, he’s kind of a d-bag.

That brings us down to two. Let’s be real here, and much as we love to hate, hate, hate on Brent… the man can toss a pigskin. Doing what he did at 40 years of age last year was pretty remarkable, but the reason why I’m extremely hesitant to announce him as the fourth best quarterback in the NFL is just that: he really is too old. According to a recent report, the reason Brent remains undecided on whether or not he’ll be back next season has to do with the fact that his ankle is still bothering him from the beating he took in the NFC Championship game. That’s what old people do, they die… and take really long to heal from injuries. We all know the real reason Brent remains undecided is because he doesn’t want to go through training camp, but his age is a major concern why I wouldn’t rank him over…

Instead of a picture of Rodgers here, I decided to put another photo of Cutler sucking at the game of football. He's so good at not being good!

Aaron Rodgers! That’s right, I’ll say it with confidence. Rodgers is the fourth best quarterback in the league. His numbers have been as good, if not better, than anyone else’s the past two seasons, which just so happen to be his only two as a starter (take it for what it’s worth, but he actually had the most fantasy points, using a standard scoring system, of any player in the entire NFL this past season). He’s excelled under immense pressure, and while he may be 0-1 in the playoffs, don’t blame that on him. Seriously, don’t do it; he threw for four touchdowns and over 400 yards with a rushing touchdown to boot, in case you forgot. At 26, Rodgers is the youngest of all the legitimate candidates, which gives us plenty of reason to believe we haven’t yet since his peak. As long as the Packers’ line plays better next season and allows Rodgers to not be running for his life half the time, I see even bigger things for him in 2010. A possible jump into the top-3? We’ll have to wait and see. But for now, fourth best quarterback in the universe isn’t half bad.

You can e-mail Danny at dgoldin@brentfavre.com


  • hollycrat

    I'm going to disagree with you about Rivers. As a pure passer, with the last-ranked rushing offense last year, teams sat in coverage for most of the game knowing he had to throw, and he still managed to rack up 4250 yards and a 65% completion rate. Yes, he has a potty mouth, but Peyton's known for pouting, too, and that hasn't hurt him in your big-3 assessment.

    With respect to Rivers, if you consider that his worst passer rating in 2009 was 84.5 (vs. Rodgers' 57.6 v. Tampa), he's extremely stable under center. Yes, he's got some of the biggest and best receivers in the game (Vincent Jackson, Malcolm Floyd), not to mention Antonio Gates, but he still leads a team that doesn't hide its modus operandi: pass first and pass often. That he still manages to put up massive numbers is a testament to his accuracy and ability to find holes in cover-2 and cover-3 defenses. Once Rodgers can put up massive numbers against anyone and everyone, I'll put him at #4. Up through the 2009 season, however, I still think Rivers has the edge. (Not that I would want him on my team, granted. His touchdown celebrations leave much to be desired.)

  • Bryan

    I'm going to have to disagree with you about Rivers and Roethlisberger.
    Yes, Roethlisberger is kind of shady, but I'm not judging him by his character, rather by his play making skills. Whenever people what to denounce him they bring up Super Bowl XL, he was indeed terrible in that game, but what people forget is that he was one of the main reasons why the Steelers made it to the Super Bowl in the first place. In Super Bowl XLIII, he put together one of the greatest drives in Super Bowl history, after the Steelers defense gave up a quick touchdown to the Cardinals. He did this with one of the worst offensive lines in the league and a non-existent running game.
    The same goes with Rivers, sure he's a douchebag, but he's a great player. The last two years the Chargers have been atrocious at running the ball, they're defense is average at best, the only thing that has been consistent is River's passing. In 2008 he led the league in passer rating, and wasn't too shabby last year either.

    Rodgers is a great QB, and I'm happy to have him as a starter. I think Packer fans should be thankful they have Rodgers, instead of say Alex Smith, or Jason Campbell. There are lots of teams out there that would love to have Rodgers as their quaterback, but unfortunately many people in Green Bay still live in 1996.
    I don't know if I would rank Rodgers in the top 4, but I think he will get there next there.

  • dgoldin

    Yeah, you can definitely make a case for both Rivers and Roethlisberger. Personally, I really think I'd prefer Rodgers though. Rivers and Roethlisberger are both very, very solid, but I simply think we've see their peaks. With Rodgers, I think there's still room to improve on what's been a phenomenal two-year tenure as a starting quarterback.

home | top